FEDERAL PHILIPPINES is an advocacy forum to promote structural change in the Philippines to address the over-centralization of power and development and pave the way for countryside development, autonomy and equity.

“Federalism is based on ‘dual sovereignty’ of the Federation and the States…. In the Federal Republic every Estado is an autonomous regional component of the Federal Republic.”
-oOo-
As I have written in one of my previous articles, the first priority in an honest-to-goodness Charter Change (Cha-Cha) thru a Constitutional Convention (Con-Con) is the shift from highly centralized Unitary System to a highly decentralized Federal System. The main reason, for this is to dismantle “Manila Imperialism” and achieve more effective and efficient governance. When we adopt a Federal System, we must carefully divide the Philippines into several autonomous States. The question then is: “How many States will compose a federalized Philippines?”
In the book of Dr. Jose V. Abueva titled, “Charter Change for Good Governance” published by the Citizens’ Movement for a Federal Philippines (CMFP), eleven States has been proposed. These are:
  1. Bangsamoro (ARMM) with 5 provinces;
  2. Davao Region and Central Mindanao with 8 provinces;
  3. Western and Northern Mindanao with 12 provinces;
  4. Central-Eastern Visayas with 10 provinces;
  5. Western Visayas and Palawan with 7 provinces;
  6. Bicol with 7 provinces;
  7. Southern Luzon with 8 provinces;
  8. Metro Manila (NCR) with 6 provinces;
  9. Central Luzon with 7 provinces;
  10. Cordillera (CAR) with 6 provinces; andNorthern Luzon with 9 provinces;

The criteria adopted in this proposed division are:

  1. Economic Viability
  2. Contiguousness; and
  3. Culture

The writer, on the other hand, recommends a “Two-Step Determination of Autonomous States” to ENSURE economic viabilities of these States with Minimum of financial “risk” for both the Federal / National government and State governments.

Here is my proposed initial or first eight States:

  1. Bangsamoro (ARMM) with 5 provinces;
  2. Davao Region and Central Mindanao with 8 provinces;
  3. Western and Northern Mindanao with 12 provinces;
  4. Visayas and Palawan with 17 provinces;
  5. Bicol and Southern Luzon with 15 provinces;
  6. Metro Manila (NCR) with 13 cities and 4 adjacent municipalities;
  7. Central Luzon with 7 provinces; and
  8. Cordillera and Northern Luzon with 15 provinces

Yes, the criteria of Economic Viability and Contiguousness are initially given more importance.

After 15-20 years, the Second Step will take place. This means that Congress or the New Parliament will mandatorily review these eight States and see if there will be a need to divide one or more of these States into a maximum 9to avoid gerrymandering) of two. Of course, the same three criteria mentioned earlier will guide said review. No need for another Cha-Cha to do this for Congress or the New Parliament Constitution.

This “Two Steps” approach will end once and for all questions about economic viability of some States. This also shows that if we really desire for a Federal Republic of the Philippines in the earliest time, WE CAN DO IT ONE CHA-CHA. No more of this “grassroots/constituent-initiated transition” as proposed by the controversial Consultative Commission (Con-Com) which is actually a design to delay the adoption of a Federal System in the country. No more of this two Cha-Chas before a federal system is finally adopted. Of course sufficient time must be allocated in this regard. No undue rush on Cha-Cha thru Con-Con.

We are aware that some smaller areas would like to become – immediately as autonomous States such as Palawan, Cebu, SoCSarGen (South Cotabato, Saranggani and General Santos), etc. To be honest, such position somehow presents some serious negative reactions especially from anti-federal people which use this argument that some federalists are creating their own “fiefdoms.” That is why we appeal to these federalists to “sober up” a little and support our “Two Steps” strategy. Those places I mentioned can later on pursue this matter after we gained more experience and improved the country’s economic standing in implementing the federal system. How about it guys?

The powers appropriately vested in the autonomous State government must be clearly specified in its State Constitution. These are:

  1. Education
  2. Health
  3. Infrastructure and Public Works
  4. Agriculture
  5. Industry
  6. Police
  7. State Judicial System
  8. Communication and Transportation
  9. Custom and Taxation
  10. Others

The autonomous State will have this local government set-up:

Autonomous State

Local Government Units as before:

  1. Provinces / Chartered Cities
  2. Component Cities / Municipalities
  3. Barangays

10 comments:

  1. luvinbcan on August 30, 2008 at 9:12 PM

    The size of the autonomous state is not the critical factor. It is the fiscal power. How much should go to the different provinces. In modern economy, balkanization is not a sound direction, and local people will realize that.

    Federalism is the answer for our woes regarding the manila cetric governance. However, we must beware not to repeat thesame mistake in the local level. There is a big tendency also for a Dabaw centric governance.

    Lets go for it, and it should be now.

    Luvin Candari

     
  2. Unknown on October 23, 2008 at 4:26 AM

    I agree. Ironically, the most viable federal states are not on the list.

    OTOH, many or most of the proposed states are artificial and do not reflect cultural or historical realities. Central Luzon, for instance, is an artificial entity to which no one would owe loyalty. The Tagalog and Ilocano portions should be transferred to their respective states, while the Kapampangan portion, 27% of the population, should be constituted into a separate state. According to Dr. Rene Azurin:"But, of the proposed eleven (or so) federal states, no more than a few - like the Cebuano state or the Pampangueno-Tarlaqueno state - would actually be able to stand on their own financially."
    (Azurin, Rene. On Decentralizing Government, p. 5. Paper presented at the Dialogues on Federalism. Center for Local and Regional Governance, NCPAG, UP Diliman, Quezon City, 3 August 2007. Originally published in the book Stationary Bandits: Essays in Political Power, also by Dr. Azurin. Platypus Press, 2007).

    The Kapampangan Region has a sufficiently large area and population to become a region or federal state. Kapampangan-majority areas - Pampanga province, plus the highly urbanized city of Angeles, the Tarlac towns of Bamban, Capas and Concepcion, and the city of Tarlac - together registered a population of 2,398,144 in 2000 (it would be even larger if historically Kapampangan areas, like adjoining areas of Bataan and Nueva Ecija where Kapampangan is still spoken, are included). This is larger than that of the Cordillera and Caraga regions (1,365,412 and 2,095,367, respectively, in 2000) and nearly as large as that of the ARMM (2,412,159 in 2000). Its area (3,424.68 sq km) is much bigger than that of Metro Manila (636 sq km), a separate region and a proposed autonomous entity in a federal system. Moreover, it is larger in area and population than at least 26 independent countries, including Barbados, Grenada, Liechtenstein, Maldives, Malta, Mauritius and Seychelles, and in population than another 26 including Brunei, Cyprus, Estonia, Fiji, Gabon, Guyana and Swaziland. It is larger in area than both Singapore and the Chinese Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong.

    Of the eight major language groups, only Kapampangans and Pangasinenses do not have regions of their own, and consequently, only the two have not been given separate states in most proposals for federalization.

     
  3. Anonymous on December 5, 2008 at 12:23 AM

    I concur with the Kapampangan. I have been making it kind of a hobby to sit and draw-up Negeri (Malay word for "state" which I prefer over "estado" because the latter shows ignorance or abandonment of our Austronesian-Malayo-Polynesian roots) boundaries and I always draw a boundary for an independent Pampanga Negeri, regardless of its land size. It is a linguistically and fiscally rationale move. I also personally think that we should call the Negeris by their ethnological/linguistic divides, i.e. Ilokos, Tagalog, Ifugao, Pampanga, Bikol, Bisaya, etc.
    Federalism is definitely the way to go. Aside from the points discussed, anybody else think how absurd it is that the RP has more governors than the US, a country more than 3x the population and more than 30x the land size? Or that it has almost 3x more provinces than Indonesia, a countrty 3x the population and 6x the land size of the RP? Are we just that incapable of governing?
    Thoughts?

     
  4. Anonymous on April 17, 2010 at 9:02 PM

    I think the it is best that we should only have 3 states and make the NCR an autonomous region and each region should have a representative in parliament in a parliamentary setting and if ever we'll have a presidential federal ggovernment, each region should be represented in the senate. That means each region will only elect 1 senator.
    The regions would be:
    1. Ilocos
    2. Ifugao
    3. Cagayan
    4. Eastern Luzon
    5. Central Luzon
    6. National Capital Region
    7. Bicol Region
    8. MIMAROPA
    9. Western Visayas
    10. Central Visayas
    11. Eastern Visayas
    12. Carigara
    13. Davao
    14. Southern Mindanao
    15. Northern Mindanao
    16. Bangsamoro (ARMM)
    17. Zamboanga Peninsula

    Luzon would have 7 regions but only 6 senators as the National Capital Region will have its own governor. While the state of Visayas will have 4 regions and Mindanao, 6 regions. To avoid the imperialist syndrome, adjasent cities and municipalities should be consolidated into 1 revenue district so that the revenues are identifyable and 40% of that revenue stays and spent in that revenue district. 30% of the revenue goes to the state and the rest to the national government. Each state should provide for the educational infrastructures for the local government units which could not afford to provide these on their own. The state should also provide each region the best medical facilities and health services available. This doesn't mean that we'll have to build hospitals with the best facility in every local government unit, we'll only have to make it accessable by providing transportation like ambulances and medicAir units. But every region should have one hospital that is well equipped with modern facilties and competent staff that can provide the best medical treatment and major operations or surgeries so that patients won't have to travel far for major surgery and/or treatment. If the purpose of a federal government is decentralization, everything should be decentralize.

     
  5. Ricky Eslit on April 19, 2010 at 10:00 AM

    The Federal Republic of the Philippines:

    The State of Luzon

    1. Ilocos Region (Ilocos Norte, Ilocos Sur, La Union, Pangasinan and Batanes)
    2. Ifugao Region ( Abra, Kalinga Apayao, Mountain Province, Ifugao and Benguet)
    3. Isabela Region (Cagayan, Isabela, Nueva Vizcaya and Aurora)
    4. Central Luzon (Zambales, Bataan, Tarlac, Pampanga and Nueva Ecija)
    5. National Capital Region (Metro Manila, Bulacan, Rizal, Cavite and Laguna)
    6. Southern Tagalog Region (Quezon, Batangas and Marinduque)
    7. Bicol Region (Camarines Norte, Camarines Sur, Catanduanes, Albay and Sorsogon)

    The State of Visayas

    1. PAMINRO (Palawan, Mindoro Oriental, Mindoro Occidental and Romblon)
    2. Ilonggo Region (Antique, Aklan, Capiz, Iloilo and Negros Occidental)
    3. Cebuano Region (Negros Oriental, Cebu, Bohol, Siquijor and Soutern Leyte)
    4. Waray Region (Leyte, Biliran, Masbate, Northern Samar, Western Samar and Eastern Samar)

    The State of Mindanao

    1. Carigara Region (Agusan del Norte, Agusan del Sur, Surigao del Norte and Surigao del Sur)
    2. Davao Region (Davao City, Davao Norte, Davao Oriental and Davao del Sur)
    3. Northern Mindanao(Bukidnon, Lanao del Norte, Misamis Oriental, Gingoog City and Cagayan de Oro City)
    4. Bangsamoro (Lanao del Sur, Maguindanao, Sulu and Tawi Tawi)
    5. Southern Mindanao (North Cotabato, Sultan Kudarat, South Cotabato and Sarangani)
    6. Zanboanga Region (Misamis Occidental, Zamboanga del Norte, Zamboanga City, Zamboanga del Sur Basilan and Zamboanga Sibugay)

    Each Region should have one(1) senator except for the National Capital Region which will be under special administrative charter much like the current set-up of the MMDA.

     
  6. Paul Alli on October 21, 2010 at 3:53 AM

    On dividing the country into federal form of government is the best thing that can happen to underdeveloped regions like Samar. It was once very rich in natural resources such as hardwood, copper, chromite, manganese, etc., and yet it remains poor. By giving more power to the local govt to determine its economy, Samar and other underdeveloped regions will be able to develop itself. The economic criteria must take precedence in dividing the country into federal states. Second is the culture and dialect. 3rd is Security. National defense must remain with the federal govt. and police must be divided into 2 division -federal and local each with checks and balances to prevent usurpation of power by local warlords, or political dynasties.

     
  7. Скачать Opera для мобильного бесплатно on January 24, 2012 at 2:50 AM

    Agues come on лучшие темы для нокиа 6233 horseback, but go away opera mini пк on foot

     
  8. Anonymous on December 26, 2012 at 2:42 AM

    In my personal opinion as a negrense , we hope to be removed in an iloilocentric state of region. We seek a one negros, one region form of state. We have experienced indepence and self reliance from the regional center. A senator have been pouring projects in iloilo and none to the negros and other provinces. Just an opinion

     
  9. Unknown on March 14, 2015 at 9:39 PM

    >>> In dividing our nation to form new states for federalization, I believe the current set-up of our regions is already a good composition of provinces. They've been bind together for several years and people living in that regions have already had connections in terms of political, cultural, economic, language and social developments. Most importantly, citizens of the provinces have already put loyalty on their respective regions; so there is no need to break them apart. Example: the Region of Northern Mindanao. The 5 provinces namely, Bukidnon, Camiguin, Misamis Oriental , Misamis Occidental and Lanao del Norte have long been accepted a notion that their mother city is Cagayan de Oro as a center of commerce and trade in the Region. So no need for bukidnon to be separated to join Davao Region as what you have stated in the blog. this is just my opinion. Thank you..

     
  10. Anonymous on March 17, 2020 at 11:57 PM

    I'm Абрам Александр a businessman who was able to revive his dying lumbering business through the help of a God sent lender known as Benjamin Lee the Loan Consultant of Le_Meridian Funding Service. Am resident at Yekaterinburg Екатеринбург. Well are you trying to start a business, settle your debt, expand your existing one, need money to purchase supplies. Have you been having problem trying to secure a Good Credit Facility, I want you to know that Le_Meridian Funding Service. Is the right place for you to resolve all your financial problem because am a living testimony and i can't just keep this to myself when others are looking for a way to be financially lifted.. I want you all to contact this God sent lender using the details as stated in other to be a partaker of this great opportunity Email: lfdsloans@lemeridianfds.com OR WhatsApp/Text +1-989-394-3740.

     

Subscribe!

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Latest Posts